I don’t know why it’s still so surprising to me that proponents of ‘logic’ and ‘reason’ can often be as unreasonable as the fundamentalists they demonize. I suppose it’s a natural reaction to the ignorance of reason from, say, Creationists, that they’d be met with equal ignorance from advocates of ‘reason.’ I guess they figure they should fight fire with fire, but stooping to their level is as bad as losing in my book. Any true lover of wisdom must accept the universal knowledge that we cannot truly know anything. The multitudes of people who view scientific theory as the last word on any question about the universe tend to ignore this fact, even if they do know it, as soon as they get involved in a heated argument. They completely disregard the maleable and ever-changing nature of science and its theories, and propose that the latest commonly accepted theory is fact.
Take for example the Big Bang Theory (not the TV show). If someone in this day and age tried to argue that the big bang theory is wrong, they would surely be met with disdain and condescension from these scientific fundamentalists. If they proposed that, according to Hindu texts, the universe is recycled, created and destroyed in a cyclical process for eternity, they would almost certainly be labelled a fundamentalist and a religious kook. Their accusers would probably ignore the fact that the recycled universe theory has been around almost as long as the big bang theory, and was even entertained by Albert Einstein. They probably wouldn’t even consider the recent research which has concluded that a recycled universe is much more likely to create the inflation necessary to the big bang model. Even if they accepted that the cyclic model is possible, they would still insist that the Hindu scriptures can hold no useful insight into the matter, since they are not based on scientific research. They would see no significance in the fact that a roughly 4,000 year old text proposes a theory that may soon replace the currently accepted one, and they certainly wouldn’t admit that the scripture has any more relevance in the argument despite its being theoretically verified.
Please understand that this is in no way an argument against atheism, or a call to convert to Hinduism and worship Brahma. This is simply a plea for everyone on either side to calm down, listen to the wisdom of their ancestors as well as contemporary experts, and consider all possibilities in any matter, especially the most important ones.
If the basis of creationism is a literal translation of the Bible, do creationists also believe that the Earth is flat and fixed, with the sun and other planets revolving around it?
The old legends say we came from a planet. I’m serious. That somehow one planet produced us on its own, totally randomly. Seems pretty ridiculous to me. The most complex thing I’ve ever seen a planet produce is a chemical storm. But that’s what they say. Supposedly this magical planet somehow had more than just a handful of elements, it had hundreds. And all those random chemicals magically came together to create a perfect biome just for us. It’s absurd. This planet somehow produced its own reaction turbines that took in our carbon dioxide and converted it to oxygen. And they were supposedly all over the place. I mean, this stuff is laughable. On top of that, it could magically produce nutrients out of its crust. And there were little beings like us, only not as smart, whose bodies were made of nutrients and we would kill them and eat them. For real, this is in the archives. This magical planet produced everything we needed, we didn’t have to go from planet to planet gathering resources to convert to nutrients. Everything was laid right at our feet. Seriously, people actually believe this shit. I guess I get it. It’s nice to imagine a place like that. Makes you feel special.
It’s bullshit though. I mean, just look at the evidence. We’re an extremely complex organization of about 100 elements, put together in just the right way, and programmed to reproduce. We were obviously made on purpose by someone or something. And they probably didn’t get it right, so they just jettisoned us out. An experiment gone wrong. How else do you explain it? We bicker and argue and believe stupid stories. We have to scrounge around space for the elements we need to keep us alive. We can’t self-sustain, so they just discarded us. At least that makes the most sense to me. Seems way more probable than a magical planet out in some distant galaxy. But they’re right, I don’t know for sure. I just go where the evidence leads instead of blindly believing some old superstition.
But we got too greedy, the legends say. We used up all the resources there, so we had to leave. But someday it’ll revive itself, this magical planet out there, and we can return and live with everything at our feet again. It’s just false hope is what it is. People want to believe in some utopia, past or present or both. It’s bullshit. People need to wake up. Whatever. I guess it doesn’t hurt anybody if they want to believe it. They just want to feel like there’s some purpose behind all of this. Otherwise they’d just jettison themselves, which I wouldn’t mind to be honest. That’s mean to say. They’re not hurting anyone, they’re just annoying. It’s a nice thought though. I guess I can’t blame them. It’d be great if I was wrong, if one day we found it. I’d be the first to apologize. I hope I am wrong. I hope one day we can just stay on one planet that provides everything for us. Planet Eden. Sounds like a nice place.